...SPOILERS...
I’m
always enthralled by novels that are reimagined classics. From modern-day
fairytales to revamped fables, I’m always eager to try out a new version of an
old story. When I glanced at The Goddess Test and noticed that it was a new
take on the Hades and Persephone myth, I was sold. But it turned out that the
actual execution of the story was not nearly as good as it could have been. The
idea was fine—the heroine would have to pass seven tests in order to become
immortal. If she failed, her memory would be wiped, and she would return to her
normal life. This
could have been a very promising story, but the tests were mediocre. They were
excessively cheesy and profound, being obviously fitted to allow the
protagonist to pass them. I suppose the general saying holds true: readers do
not mind coincidences when they create conflict, but readers rage at
coincidences that neatly resolve a character’s issues. The seven tests were
easily passed by the heroine with little effort on her part. As she studied,
she proved her diligence against sloth. As she gave away dresses to her friend,
she proved her triumph over greed. It was all too simple. Another thing that
irritated me was that the entire cast of characters, minus the oblivious
protagonist, was part of the conspiracy. Every single side character that was
introduced in the story later became involved in the goddess trials. Most of
them turned out to be Greek gods or goddesses, and the characters’ unveilings
made my head spin. The author had the audacity to make every character essential
to the plot and part of the conspiracy. This boldness is atypical in novels, so
I will commend Carter for her brave risk with the story. Maybe the novel’s redemption even lies within
that point; while it was frustrating to have everybody be somebody else, it was
still shocking, and thus a good plot twist. Still, the whole story came off as
a bit clichéd, which detracted from the plot as a whole.
No comments:
Post a Comment